Tillich and the Philosophy of the Subject
This article underlines the value of the philosophy of the subject. Its value is contested, both in itself and related to Paul Tillich. In Dutch theology, the philosophy of the subject was never well received, which seems disadvantageous to the study of Tillich. The present article first points out...
Veröffentlicht in: | NTT |
---|---|
1. VerfasserIn: | |
Beteiligte: | |
Medienart: | Elektronisch Review |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Amsterdam University Press
[2020]
|
In: |
NTT
Jahr: 2020, Band: 74, Heft: 2, Seiten: 139-148 |
Rezension von: | Offenbarung, absolute Wahrheit und interreligiöser Dialog (Berlin : De Gruyter, 2019) (Benjamins, Hendrik S.)
|
RelBib Classification: | AE Religionspsychologie KAJ Kirchengeschichte 1914-; neueste Zeit KDD Evangelische Kirche NBE Anthropologie VA Philosophie |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Postmodernism
B interpretation of life B Rezension B Paul Tillich B subject philosophy |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Zusammenfassung: | This article underlines the value of the philosophy of the subject. Its value is contested, both in itself and related to Paul Tillich. In Dutch theology, the philosophy of the subject was never well received, which seems disadvantageous to the study of Tillich. The present article first points out some fundamental questions concerning the subject in recent thought, next describes the approach to the subject from a subject-philosophical point of view, and finally underlines that the subject is a matter of concern for theology. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2590-3268 |
Bezug: | Kritik in "Reply to Henk van den Belts and Rick Benjamins articles (2020)"
|
Enthält: | Enthalten in: NTT
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5117/NTT2020.2.004.BENJ |