Diversifying Diversity in Religious Education: A Rejoinder to Cragg-Kim and Hosffman Ospino
In this article, I comment on responses to my Presidential Address offered by HyeRan Kim-Cragg and Hosffman Ospino. While I take on board their call to diversify the references on defending pedagogies of difference and hope, I caution against judging arguments on the grounds of the origins of their...
| Published in: | Religious education |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[2020]
|
| In: |
Religious education
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religious pluralism
/ Interfaith dialogue
/ Religious pedagogy
|
| RelBib Classification: | AH Religious education AX Inter-religious relations |
| Further subjects: | B
Pedagogy
B Diversity B Difference B Hope |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Summary: | In this article, I comment on responses to my Presidential Address offered by HyeRan Kim-Cragg and Hosffman Ospino. While I take on board their call to diversify the references on defending pedagogies of difference and hope, I caution against judging arguments on the grounds of the origins of their authors. Neither Enlightenment nor Counter-Enlightenment thought can provide a defensible basis for this dialogical pedagogy, I argue. So, we need a new start grounded in authors who eschew comprehensive universal views that marginalize particular groups such as the historic otherization of Jew and Judaism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1547-3201 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Religious education
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/00344087.2020.1772607 |