Tertullian on Divine Sovereignty and Free Will: A Christian/Stoic Resolution
Christian thinkers in the patristic era were not reluctant to integrate classical philosophy with biblical theology as they addressed the seeming incompatibility of free will and determinism (fate). This paper compares and contrasts Tertullian and the Stoics as they explain three issues relating to...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Philosophy Documentation Center
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Philosophy & theology
Année: 2019, Volume: 31, Numéro: 1/2, Pages: 3-19 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Tertullianus, Quintus Septimius Florens 150-230
/ Stoa
/ Libre arbitre
/ Logos
/ Anthropologie théologique
/ Téléologie
|
| RelBib Classification: | KAB Christianisme primitif NBC Dieu NBE Anthropologie TB Antiquité VA Philosophie |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | Christian thinkers in the patristic era were not reluctant to integrate classical philosophy with biblical theology as they addressed the seeming incompatibility of free will and determinism (fate). This paper compares and contrasts Tertullian and the Stoics as they explain three issues relating to freedom and fate: 1) The operation of the Logos, 2) Theological Anthropology, and 3) Teleology. While in agreement with the Stoics on several key points, Tertullian crucially departs from them as he argues it is not by necessity—but rather by voluntary collaboration between humanity and the Logos—that the Creation arrives at its determinate end. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2153-828X |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Philosophy & theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/philtheol2020519121 |