The Struggle for Cognitive Liberty: Retrofitting the Self in Activist Theology

Human freedom is best understood as self-determination. Free action consists of deliberation, decision, and action. The free human person deserves dignity, that is, we each deserve to be treated as a moral end and not merely as a means to someone else's end. Neurocentrist philosophy-a form of e...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theology and science
Main Author: Peters, Ted 1941- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge [2020]
In: Theology and science
RelBib Classification:CF Christianity and Science
FD Contextual theology
NBE Anthropology
ZD Psychology
Further subjects:B eliminative materialism
B cognitive liberty
B Liberation Theology
B Activism
B Consciousness
B Alan Weissenbacher
B Self
B Political Theology
B Freedom
B Dignity
B neurocentrism
B Public Theology
B dignitarian counterpolitics
B freedom-denial
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Summary:Human freedom is best understood as self-determination. Free action consists of deliberation, decision, and action. The free human person deserves dignity, that is, we each deserve to be treated as a moral end and not merely as a means to someone else's end. Neurocentrist philosophy-a form of eliminative materialism-based on neuroscience, however, threatens the extinction of the human self and, thereby, threatens to turn our experience of freedom and dignity into a mere delusion. This evacuates the moral agenda of every activist liberation theology. One task of today's public theologian is to protect Cognitive Liberty, because it conceptually undergirds political, economic, and social liberation.
ISSN:1474-6719
Contains:Enthalten in: Theology and science
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2020.1786219