Aquinas on Predication and Future Contingents. A Reply to Costa

In his paper “Aquinas, Geach, and Existence”, D. Costa maintains that Aquinas’ solution to the puzzle of future contingent events entails that future contingent entities already exist (in God’s perspective). This is tantamount to state that Aquinas endorsed a form of eternalism, since he maintained...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal for philosophy of religion
Subtitles:Special Issue - Evolutionary Research on Morality and Theological Ethics
Main Author: Gili, Luca 1987- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham [2020]
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Thomas Aquinas 1225-1274 / Being / Future / Evidence of truth
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
CB Christian life; spirituality
NBC Doctrine of God
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:In his paper “Aquinas, Geach, and Existence”, D. Costa maintains that Aquinas’ solution to the puzzle of future contingent events entails that future contingent entities already exist (in God’s perspective). This is tantamount to state that Aquinas endorsed a form of eternalism, since he maintained that past, present and future timelessly exist in God’s sight. I object that Aquinas’ texts are also compatible with another reading. In any statement of the form “S will be P”, the verb “will be” simply states the truth of the predicative link between S and P, not the existence of either S or P. In other words, I take the verb “to be” occurring in sentences describing future events as having the meaning of the “esse ut verum” (“being as true”).
Reference:Kritik von "Aquinas, Geach, and existence (2019)"
Contains:Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v12i3.3346