Aquinas on the Existence of the Future: A Response to Gili
I defend my paper “Aquinas, Geach, and Existence” [1] against objections from Luca Gili, who argued that, according to Aquinas, future contingents do not enjoy genuine existence but exist in God’s mind only. [1] Damiano Costa, “Aquinas, Geach, and existence”, European Journal for Philosophy o...
| Published in: | European journal for philosophy of religion |
|---|---|
| Subtitles: | Special Issue - Evolutionary Research on Morality and Theological Ethics |
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2020]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Thomas Aquinas 1225-1274
/ Future
/ Evidence of truth
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | I defend my paper “Aquinas, Geach, and Existence” [1] against objections from Luca Gili, who argued that, according to Aquinas, future contingents do not enjoy genuine existence but exist in God’s mind only. [1] Damiano Costa, “Aquinas, Geach, and existence”, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11, no. 3 (2019). |
|---|---|
| Reference: | Kritik von "Aquinas, Geach, and existence (2019)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v12i3.3424 |