A Response to Stephen L. Young, “Let’s Take the Text Seriously”: the Protectionist Doxa in Mainstream New Testament Studies
This response to Stephen Young’s excellent paper vindicates his general argument against protectionism, connects his analyses to some aspects of contemporary Qurʾanic and Early Islamic studies, and highlights some of the problems with the distinction between dominant protectionism and dominated prot...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 32, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 380-385 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Koran
/ Faith content
/ Protectionism
|
| RelBib Classification: | BJ Islam HC New Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
Stephen Young
B Early Islamic studies B protectionism B Qurʾān B New Testament |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This response to Stephen Young’s excellent paper vindicates his general argument against protectionism, connects his analyses to some aspects of contemporary Qurʾanic and Early Islamic studies, and highlights some of the problems with the distinction between dominant protectionism and dominated protectionism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "“Let’s Take the Text Seriously” (2019)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341481 |