Is religiousness a form of variation in personality, or in culture, or neither?: Conceptual issues and empirical indications
It has become widely recognized that religiousness has a predictable pattern of small associations with Big Five personality dimensions, and has some intersections with cultural psychology. But just how large are those culture-religiosity intersections, and are there additional associations with per...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
[2019]
|
In: |
Archive for the psychology of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 41, Issue: 3, Pages: 216-223 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religiosity
/ Personality factor
/ Cultural indicator
|
RelBib Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy AE Psychology of religion AG Religious life; material religion |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | It has become widely recognized that religiousness has a predictable pattern of small associations with Big Five personality dimensions, and has some intersections with cultural psychology. But just how large are those culture-religiosity intersections, and are there additional associations with personality when one extends beyond the restricted spectrum represented by Big Five traits? Moreover, do the answers to these questions depend on how religiousness is defined and measured? I argue that, both conceptually and empirically, religiousness itself meets the criteria for a personality dimension (including stability, heritability, and other grounds), and is simultaneously for the most part a cultural phenomenon reflecting often widely shared sets of beliefs, values, worldviews, and norms. The patterns of modest associations with other personality dimensions, from the Big Five and beyond, are consistent with both arguments. A distributive model of culture, under which culture is aggregated personalities (and especially mindsets) helps make sense of these relations. Tradition-oriented religiousness tends to have a prominent position in enduring-order (as contrasted with evolving-order) cultures, which helps account for its occasional expressions in political religion. In contrast, mystical spirituality is more prone to manifest as a sub-cultural phenomenon peripheral to mainstream culture. But for either conception—religiousness or spirituality—the same personality-and-culture propositions appear to hold. Nonetheless, religiousness seems not totally reducible to a variable for personality or cultural psychology, and considerations are introduced regarding what that irreducible element is most likely to be. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-6121 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Archive for the psychology of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0084672419894677 |