Same-Sex Intercourse Involving Jewish Men 100 BCE–100 CE: Sources and Significance for Jesus’ Sexual Politics

It is commonplace in New Testament scholarship to assume that Judaism at the turn of the Era univocally condemned same-sex intercourse among men, whether scholars use this supposition to argue that Jesus felt likewise or was uniquely accepting of the practice. The present article provides the origin...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Religion & gender
Subtitles:Special Issue: Jesus, Religion, Gender
Main Author: Zeichmann, Christopher B. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill [2020]
In: Religion & gender
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Bible / Judaism / Homosexuality / Christianity / Sexual ethics / History 100 BC-100
RelBib Classification:AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
HB Old Testament
NBF Christology
Further subjects:B Judaism and sex
B Jesus and sex
B Second Temple Judaism
B homosexual intercourse
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:It is commonplace in New Testament scholarship to assume that Judaism at the turn of the Era univocally condemned same-sex intercourse among men, whether scholars use this supposition to argue that Jesus felt likewise or was uniquely accepting of the practice. The present article provides the original-language text, English translation, and brief commentary for evidence of same-sex intercourse involving Jewish men around the turn of the Era, pointing to the varying testimonies of Josephus, Martial, a graffito, Tacitus, and the Warren Cup. The paper concludes with a reflection on the relevance of the study for understanding Jesus’ sexual politics. This article contains graphic literary and visual depictions of sexual intercourse.
ISSN:1878-5417
Contains:Enthalten in: Religion & gender
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18785417-01001001