Kristendommen er ikke nogen "stor fortælling"
H.J.L. Jensen: “Christianity is not a ‘great narrative’. A structural note on a typology of universal narratives” and P. Aa. Brandt: “Narrative and linguistic event. Comments on H.J.L. Jensen’s structural note”.Jean-François Lyotard has recently focused on the demise of the “great narratives”. But w...
| Publié dans: | Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Danois |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Univ.
[1987]
|
| Dans: |
Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
Année: 1987, Volume: 11, Pages: 75-84 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Eskatologi
B Lyotard B Fortælling |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | H.J.L. Jensen: “Christianity is not a ‘great narrative’. A structural note on a typology of universal narratives” and P. Aa. Brandt: “Narrative and linguistic event. Comments on H.J.L. Jensen’s structural note”.Jean-François Lyotard has recently focused on the demise of the “great narratives”. But what is the nature of these narratives? Jensen’s note establishes an inventory of 8 types of “universal narratives” based on three axes: A) fall vs. erection, B) mythology vs. eschatology, and C) human vs. inhuman. The “great narrative” can be characterized as a “human-erective-eschatology” whereas the core of the Christian narrative is “inhuman-erective-mythology”. The 8 types can as well be coordinated or embedded in different ways.In his comment, Brandt reformulates Jensen’s conclusions into a semiotic, generative theory of narrative sequence which involves three levels: 1) Jensen’s (A) is related to the actantial level, 2) his (B) to the discursive level, and 3) his (C) to the enunciative level. The 8 types can be rearranged in the light of the theory of speech-acts in which the addressed is attributed a lack (or deficiency?) either in the present or the future. This provides two main types of “narrative linguistic events”: the promise, which moves from the dysphoric present to the euphoric future; and the threat, which moves from the euphoric present to the dysphoric future. These linguistic events are embedded in narrative sequences. Religion as preaching is a combination of promise and threat which cannot avoid “narrativising” the addressed in the small, but tendentious, as well as in the great narratives.Hans J. Lundager Jensen og Per Aage Brandt |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1904-8181 |
| Référence: | Kommentar in "Fortælling og sproghandling (1987)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.7146/rt.v0i11.5394 |