Tertium non datur: teze k metodologickému schizmatu na poli religionistiky = Tertium non datur : theses on methodological schism in the field of religious studies
The article summarizes the main tenets of the monograph Naturalismus a protekcionismus ve studiu náboženství (Naturalism and Protectionism in the Study of Religions), published in Czech by Masaryk University Press in 2017. The monograph, to be published in English by Bloomsbury in 2020, identifies a...
| Published in: | Religio |
|---|---|
| Subtitles: | Tertium non datur |
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Czech |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Společnost
[2019]
|
| In: |
Religio
|
| Further subjects: | B
protectionism
B cognitive science of religion B Naturalism B history of religious studies B method and theory of Religious Studies |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | The article summarizes the main tenets of the monograph Naturalismus a protekcionismus ve studiu náboženství (Naturalism and Protectionism in the Study of Religions), published in Czech by Masaryk University Press in 2017. The monograph, to be published in English by Bloomsbury in 2020, identifies a serious methodological schism between naturalism and protectionism in the modern (19th and 20th century) Study of Religions, tracks the earliest roots of these competing paradigms to Pre-Socratic philosophy and early Christian literature, and evaluates the contribution of the Cognitive Science of Religion to the renewal of the naturalist approach. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2336-4475 |
| Reference: | Beschreibung von "Naturalism and protectionism in the study of religions (London : Bloomsbury Academic, 2020)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Religio
|
| Persistent identifiers: | HDL: 11222.digilib/142217 |