The Paradox of Kurt Gödel: A Response
The article analyzes author Miloa Dokulil's explanation of mathematician Kurt Godel's religious inclination. It is noted that Godel's ontological argument for God's existence was not published in his lifetime and his rational platonism leaves considerable room for speculation con...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Institute for Interdisciplinary Research
[2020]
|
| In: |
Journal of interdisciplinary studies
Jahr: 2020, Band: 32, Heft: 1/2, Seiten: 119-136 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus CB Christliche Existenz; Spiritualität VA Philosophie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Religious adherents
B Platonists B Realism B Faith B Godel, Kurt, 1906-1978 |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | The article analyzes author Miloa Dokulil's explanation of mathematician Kurt Godel's religious inclination. It is noted that Godel's ontological argument for God's existence was not published in his lifetime and his rational platonism leaves considerable room for speculation concerning his metaphysical system. It is stated that at times it is found Dokulil is examining his own belief in God as well as Godel's. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2766-0508 |
| Bezug: | Kritik von "Kurt Gödel's Religious Worldview (2020)"
|
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Journal of interdisciplinary studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/jis2020321/27 |