The Paradox of Kurt Gödel: A Response
The article analyzes author Miloa Dokulil's explanation of mathematician Kurt Godel's religious inclination. It is noted that Godel's ontological argument for God's existence was not published in his lifetime and his rational platonism leaves considerable room for speculation con...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Institute for Interdisciplinary Research
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Journal of interdisciplinary studies
Année: 2020, Volume: 32, Numéro: 1/2, Pages: 119-136 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion CB Spiritualité chrétienne VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Religious adherents
B Platonists B Realism B Faith B Godel, Kurt, 1906-1978 |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | The article analyzes author Miloa Dokulil's explanation of mathematician Kurt Godel's religious inclination. It is noted that Godel's ontological argument for God's existence was not published in his lifetime and his rational platonism leaves considerable room for speculation concerning his metaphysical system. It is stated that at times it is found Dokulil is examining his own belief in God as well as Godel's. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2766-0508 |
| Référence: | Kritik von "Kurt Gödel's Religious Worldview (2020)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of interdisciplinary studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/jis2020321/27 |