The Process-Oriented Conception of Truth in William James

In this article, I argue that William Jamess concept of truth can be interpreted accurately if we pay attention to the radical empiricism that underlines the notion in all of James's later writings and if we also see radical empiricism as a type of process thought. When we acknowledge these two...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hackett, J. Edward 1979- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Illinois Press [2020]
In: Process studies
Year: 2020, Volume: 49, Issue: 2, Pages: 209-233
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B James, William 1842-1910 / Truth / Process
RelBib Classification:TJ Modern history
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:In this article, I argue that William Jamess concept of truth can be interpreted accurately if we pay attention to the radical empiricism that underlines the notion in all of James's later writings and if we also see radical empiricism as a type of process thought. When we acknowledge these two conditions, we can see how Cheryl Misak is mistaken in reinscribing subjectivism back into Jamess radical empiricism, which attempted to overcome the subject-object distinction in the first place. In reading James through radical empiricism qua process philosophy, then, the background assumptions of James are set into relief yielding a deeper and richer conception of truth.
ISSN:2154-3682
Contains:Enthalten in: Process studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/process202049210