Myōun and the Heike: Monastic Influence in Twelfth-Century Japan

In contrast to founders of new Buddhist schools, monastic leaders of established religious centers in pre-1600 Japan have often been ignored as subjects of serious scholarship. In part, this can be explained by their involvement in political and military matters, which has been seen as of little con...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Adolphson, Mikael S. 1961- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2020
Dans: Japanese journal of religious studies
Année: 2020, Volume: 47, Numéro: 2, Pages: 189-223
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Heike monogatari / Japan / École Tiantai / Politique / Influence / Histoire 1100-1200
RelBib Classification:AD Sociologie des religions
AG Vie religieuse
BL Bouddhisme
KBM Asie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Myōun
B Genpei War
B Tendai
B Enryakuji
B Go Shirakawa
B Kiyomori
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:In contrast to founders of new Buddhist schools, monastic leaders of established religious centers in pre-1600 Japan have often been ignored as subjects of serious scholarship. In part, this can be explained by their involvement in political and military matters, which has been seen as of little consequence to religious studies or detrimental to the imperial state since, according to later ideals, the religious and political spheres were assumed to be separate. However, recent studies have demonstrated the extent to which state and religions were interdependent, especially through rituals, allowing monks a considerable presence in politics, the economy, and even in warfare. To get a deeper understanding of this interdependence at the individual level, this article focuses on the relationship between Taira no Kiyomori and the Tendai monk Myōun, both of whom were significant figures in the late Heian state.
Contient:Enthalten in: Japanese journal of religious studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.18874/jjrs.47.2.2020.189-223