Canonical and Non-Canonical Sources for Biblical History in Two Arabic Universal Histories Written by Christians in al-Andalus
Abstract This article examines the biblical material contained in two universal histories written by the Christians of al-Andalus: the so-called Kitāb Hurūshiyūsh ( KH ) and the “Mozarabic universal history” ( MUH ) preserved at MS Raqqada 2003/2. A thorough comparison of the parallel passages from...
| Published in: | Medieval encounters |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2020
|
| In: |
Medieval encounters
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
al- Andalus
/ Orosius, Paulus 385-418, Historiae adversus paganos, Arabic language
/ Mozarabic
/ World history
/ Bible history
/ Historiography
|
| RelBib Classification: | BJ Islam HA Bible KAA Church history |
| Further subjects: | B
biblical history
B Kitāb Hurūshiyūsh B Mozarabic universal history B Andalusi Christians B non-canonical sources B canonical sources |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | Abstract This article examines the biblical material contained in two universal histories written by the Christians of al-Andalus: the so-called Kitāb Hurūshiyūsh ( KH ) and the “Mozarabic universal history” ( MUH ) preserved at MS Raqqada 2003/2. A thorough comparison of the parallel passages from the Books of Samuel and Kings shows that KH , which has proved to be one of the sources of MUH for profane history, was not used by the latter’s compiler for the large fragments relating to sacred history. Both KH and MUH contain copious material concerning biblical history that was derived from sources different than the Bible. Thus, Giorgio Levi Della Vida and I, as editors of MUH and KH respectively, have observed that the biblical material derived from the Vulgate in both texts was enriched with information from Jerome’s and Isidore’s works. In this article I show that both contain a substantial amount of information absent from Jerome’s and Isidore’s works and that canonical biblical material is largely interspersed with material from non-canonical and non-biblical sources, including information well rooted in the Jewish tradition. This is especially the case in MUH . |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0674 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Medieval encounters
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700674-12340081 |