Fundamentalismo e religião da política: uma possibilidade da política como religião = Fundamentalismandpoliticalreligion:apossibilityofpolicyasreligion
This article presents arguments that seek to facilitate the understanding that the concept of Political Religion - as well as the authoritarian political experiences represented by it, such as Nazism and Stalinism - can be thought of in conjunction with the concept of fundamentalism. Furthermore, th...
Subtitles: | Fundamentalismandpoliticalreligion:apossibilityofpolicyasreligion |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[publisher not identified]
[2020]
|
In: |
Horizonte
Year: 2020, Volume: 18, Issue: 57, Pages: 1002-1030 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Political religion
/ Fundamentalism
/ Civil religion
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AD Sociology of religion; religious policy |
Further subjects: | B
Democracia
B Fundamentalismo B political religion B Fundamentalism B Autoritarismo B Democracy B Authoritarianism B Religião da Política |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | This article presents arguments that seek to facilitate the understanding that the concept of Political Religion - as well as the authoritarian political experiences represented by it, such as Nazism and Stalinism - can be thought of in conjunction with the concept of fundamentalism. Furthermore, this article also presents possibilities for the concept of Civil Religion - which can also be classified as a Public Religion - even though it is often associated with political experiences considered democratic - such as those of the United States and France - can also be considered in conjunction with that of fundamentalism. Therefore, this paper, carrying out an activity of delimitation and conceptual problematization, will define the concept of Political Religion, differentiating it from the concept of Civil Religion, and in a certain way from that of Public Religion, in an attempt to demarcate a concept of Public Religion, which has been mobilized, sometimes with a certain imprecision, by researchers from different areas. Although the objective of this article is not to empirically test the aforementioned concepts, by delimiting them, enhancing them, we seek to contribute to better yields in future analytical experiments. Esteartigoapresentaargumentosqueprocuramviabilizaroentendimentodequeoconceitodereligiãopolítica-bemcomoasexperiênciaspolíticasautoritáriasrepresentadasporele,comoonazismoeostalinismo-podeserpensadoemarticulaçãoaoconceitodefundamentalismo.Ademais,esteartigotambémapresentapossibilidadesparaqueoconceitodereligiãocivil-quetambémpodeserclassificadocomoreligiãopública-mesmosendomuitasvezesassociadoàsexperiênciaspolíticastidascomodemocráticas-comoasdosEstadosUnidosedaFrança-tambémpossaserpensadoemarticulaçãoaodefundamentalismo.Paratanto,estetrabalho,realizandoumaatividadededelimitaçãoeproblematizaçãoconceitual,definiráoconceitodereligiãopolítica,diferenciando-odoconceitodereligiãocivil,edecertaformadodereligiãopública,emumatentativadedemarcarumconceito,dereligiãopolítica,quetemsidomobilizado,porvezescomcertaimprecisão,porpesquisadoresdediferentesáreas.Conquantooobjetivodesteartigonãosejadecolocarempiricamenteàprovaosconceitossupracitados,aodelimitá-los,potencializando-os,busca-secontribuirparamelhoresrendimentosemexperimentosanalíticosfuturos. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2175-5841 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Horizonte
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5752/P.2175-5841.2020v18n57p1002 |