Forms of belief-less religion: why non-doxasticism makes fictionalism redundant for the pro-religious agnostic
Which form of belief-less religion should the agnostic prefer: non-doxasticism which substitutes belief with some weaker cognitive attitude, or fictionalism which standardly treats religious life as a game of make-believe? I argue for non-doxasticism due to its ability to handle the problems associa...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2021]
|
In: |
Religious studies
Jahr: 2021, Band: 57, Heft: 1, Seiten: 49-65 |
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Agnostizismus
/ Glaube
/ Episteme
/ Religiosität
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus CB Christliche Existenz; Spiritualität |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Zusammenfassung: | Which form of belief-less religion should the agnostic prefer: non-doxasticism which substitutes belief with some weaker cognitive attitude, or fictionalism which standardly treats religious life as a game of make-believe? I argue for non-doxasticism due to its ability to handle the problems associated with fictionalism. However, in an argument for exclusive availability I go further, denying even that the agnostic has a choice: if she has a religious pro-attitude only non-doxasticism is rationally available to her. I also address and reject a recent argument by Finlay Malcolm to the effect that non-doxasticism cannot be properly distinguished from fictionalism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-901X |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412519000027 |