Craig's Contradictory "Kalam": Trouble at the Moment of Creation
William Lane Craig's much-discussed kalam cosmological argument for God's existence is intended to provide support for a particular theistic explanation of the origin of the universe. I argue here that Craig's theistic account of the origin of the universe entails two contradictions a...
| Published in: | TheoLogica |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
[2021]
|
| In: |
TheoLogica
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God NBD Doctrine of Creation VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Timeless God
B William Craig B Cosmological Argument B Kalām B agent causation |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | William Lane Craig's much-discussed kalam cosmological argument for God's existence is intended to provide support for a particular theistic explanation of the origin of the universe. I argue here that Craig's theistic account of the origin of the universe entails two contradictions and hence should be rejected. The main contribution of the paper is the identification of some relatively straightforward but previously unrecognized problems in Craig's hypothesis that the beginning of the universe was a temporal effect of a timeless personal cause. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "No Trouble (2021)"
Kritik in "Can God Be Timeless Without Creation and Temporal Subsequent to Creation? (2021)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v4i3.55133 |