Response to the Respondents: Competition, Qumran and Supersessionism

The critics of JBHT in this issue have questioned three main aspects of the book: its assertion that early Christians competed with people who believed that John the Baptist was the principal figure in the history of salvation, its assertion that early in his career the Baptist was a member of the Q...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marcus, Joel 1951- (Author)
Contributors: Adinolfi, Federico (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Myles, Robert J. (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Baumgarten, Albert I. 1942- (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Roberts, Erin (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Klawans, Jonathan (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Wassen, Cecilia 1962- (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Rothschild, Clare K. 1964- (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2021
In: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Year: 2021, Volume: 19, Issue: 1, Pages: 99-133
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B John the Baptist / Qumran Community / Judaism / Dead Sea scrolls, Qumran Scrolls
RelBib Classification:BH Judaism
HA Bible
HH Archaeology
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The critics of JBHT in this issue have questioned three main aspects of the book: its assertion that early Christians competed with people who believed that John the Baptist was the principal figure in the history of salvation, its assertion that early in his career the Baptist was a member of the Qumran community, and the way in which the book situates the Baptist in relation to Second Temple Judaism in general. The article addresses these concerns, rebutting certain objections but acknowledging areas in which the book could have been more nuanced or further developed.
ISSN:1745-5197
Reference:Kritik von "Catching John in Four Nets? Competition, Qumran, Sacramentalism and Messianism (2021)"
Kritik von "John the Baptist in Memory, Judaism and Historical Materialism (2021)"
Kritik von "John the Baptist (2021)"
Kritik von "Naturalizing Christians (2021)"
Kritik von "Analogies, Possibilities and Probabilities (2021)"
Kritik von "Reflections on John the Baptist in History and Theology by Joel Marcus (2021)"
Kritik von "A Review of Joel Marcus, John the Baptist in History and Theology (2021)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/17455197-19010005