“For I Say”: A Keeper at the Rabbinic Gates of Doubt
Abstract The rabbinic idiom “for I say” ( שאני אומר ) has been construed philologically as a specific type of presumption, buttressed with first-person rhetoric. From the perspective of legal analysis, I contend that “for I say” and presumption are diametrically opposed decision-rules, employed cons...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2021
|
| In: |
The review of rabbinic Judaism
Year: 2021, Volume: 24, Issue: 1, Pages: 56-72 |
| Further subjects: | B
Jewish law and jurisprudence
B factual uncertainty B legal fictions B Narrative B talmudic law |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1760096687 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211001162928.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210609s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15700704-12341375 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1760096687 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1760096687 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1225374715 |0 (DE-627)1744983224 |4 aut |a Baris, Michael | |
| 109 | |a Baris, Michael | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a “For I Say”: A Keeper at the Rabbinic Gates of Doubt |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The rabbinic idiom “for I say” ( שאני אומר ) has been construed philologically as a specific type of presumption, buttressed with first-person rhetoric. From the perspective of legal analysis, I contend that “for I say” and presumption are diametrically opposed decision-rules, employed consistently in tannaitic and amoraic literature. While presumptions are exclusionary rules, circumscribing doubt, “for I say” is an inclusionary rule, validating doubt. The versatility of the “for I say” rule testifies to its preliminary nature – while the outcome is determined by a robust set of primary decision rules. “For I say” should be read as: for I can say, legitimizing doubt and calling on primary rabbinic rules for treating cases of factual uncertainty, in contestable instances. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a talmudic law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jewish law and jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a factual uncertainty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Narrative | |
| 650 | 4 | |a legal fictions | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The review of rabbinic Judaism |d Leiden : Brill, 2001 |g 24(2021), 1, Seite 56-72 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)363738568 |w (DE-600)2103430-8 |w (DE-576)273874322 |x 1570-0704 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g pages:56-72 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/15700704-12341375 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/rrj/24/1/article-p56_3.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3936214476 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1760096687 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210609042640 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210609||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-06-08#753A6B899C8F39C473CA9CC13FF4811962456744 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||