Charles Taylor and Paul Tillich on Interreligious Dialogue

In his book, A Secular Age, Charles Taylor suggests using the notion of fullness as a focal point for dialogue between different religious or non-religious beliefs and traditions. However, Taylor's notion of fullness can hardly correspond with Buddhism which emphasizes the notion of emptiness a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Studies in interreligious dialogue
Main Author: Hung, Andrew Tsz Wan ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters 2021
In: Studies in interreligious dialogue
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Taylor, Charles 1931-, A secular age / Interfaith dialogue / Tillich, Paul 1886-1965
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
AX Inter-religious relations
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:In his book, A Secular Age, Charles Taylor suggests using the notion of fullness as a focal point for dialogue between different religious or non-religious beliefs and traditions. However, Taylor's notion of fullness can hardly correspond with Buddhism which emphasizes the notion of emptiness and anatman (selfless). In contrast, Paul Tillich's the concept of ultimate concern is very influential in regard to East Asian Religions. Contemporary Confucians and Buddhist scholars also find that Tillich's concept of ultimate concern can adequately cover the concerns of different religions and provide a bridge for inter-religious dialogue. Nonetheless, Tillich's suggestion of the framework of an ideal religion seems to be too Christian-centric and is hardly accepted by other religions. Furthermore, I argue that Taylor's historical comparative hermeneutical approach can be complementary to Tillich's method of dialectical correlation so that substantial interreligious dialogue and formation of certain hybrid forms of a religious framework might be achieved.
ISSN:1783-1806
Contains:Enthalten in: Studies in interreligious dialogue
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2143/SID.31.1.3289544