Der Geschichte im Konkreten begegnen: Antwortversuche von M. Blondel und E. Troeltsch
G. W. Leibniz develops the idea of the vinculum substantiale in order to be able to explain reality by creating unity between the monads by the substantial bond. For M. Blondel, human action is carried by love and the whole of reality is connected in it. With his historical method, E. Troeltsch atte...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Pontificia Univ. Gregoriana
2021
|
| In: |
Gregorianum
Year: 2021, Volume: 102, Issue: 2, Pages: 329-350 |
| RelBib Classification: | FA Theology KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history NBE Anthropology TA History VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Troeltsch, Ernst (1865-1923)
B Werkanalyse B Blondel, Maurice (1861-1949) |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | G. W. Leibniz develops the idea of the vinculum substantiale in order to be able to explain reality by creating unity between the monads by the substantial bond. For M. Blondel, human action is carried by love and the whole of reality is connected in it. With his historical method, E. Troeltsch attempts to explain the reality of history. Only in the knowledge of history the present can be understood. Blondel and Troeltsch capture reality because they do not separate transcendence and immanence. Man can grasp the meaning of reality if he acts in history and understands this action as the realization of the whole reality. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0017-4114 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Gregorianum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.32060/gregorianum.102/1.2021.329-350 |