A cognitive semantic study of biblical Hebrew: the root šlm for completeness-balance
The author employs cognitive semantic and frame semantic to demonstrate the basic semantic structure of the Biblical Hebrew verb שׁלם.
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Livre |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Service de livraison Subito: | Commander maintenant. |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
Boston
BRILL
2021
|
| Dans: |
Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics (volume 104)
Année: 2021 |
| Recensions: | [Rezension von: Leong, Andrew Chin Hei, A cognitive semantic study of biblical Hebrew : the root šlm for completeness-balance] (2023) (Hoyt, JoAnna M.)
|
| Collection/Revue: | Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics
volume 104 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Hébreu
/ Sémantique
/ shlm
|
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Electronic books
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
| Résumé: | The author employs cognitive semantic and frame semantic to demonstrate the basic semantic structure of the Biblical Hebrew verb שׁלם. Intro -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Figures -- Tables -- Abbreviations -- Introduction -- 1. A Survey of Previously Conducted Research -- 1.1. From ָלוֹם to לם: From Peace to Intactness and Completeness -- 1.2. Exclusive Focus on לם: To Be Complete vs. To Pay -- 2. The Semitic Cognates of לם -- 2.1. Northwest Semitic -- 2.2. East Semitic (Akkadian) -- 2.3. Summary of the Semitic Cognate Study -- 3. Research Question -- 4. Limitations of Our Research -- 5. Outline of the Book -- Chapter 1. Methodology -- 1. Theoretical Question: Homonymy and Polysemy -- 1.1. Diachronic Relatedness: Etymology -- 1.2. Synchronic Relatedness: One Single Core Meaning -- 1.3. Cognitive Semantics: A Network of Core Meanings -- 1.4. Homonymy and Polysemy Form a Continuum -- 2. Methodological Discussion -- 2.1. Distributional Corpus Analysis -- 2.2. Frame Semantics -- 2.3. Valence -- 3. Illustration of the Methodology by Way of Examples -- 4. Specificity of the Present Study Vis-à-Vis Contemporary Semantic Studies -- Chapter 2. The לם D Stem -- 1. To Give Back: To Reach a Balance (between Two Parties) -- 1.1. To Restitute -- 1.2. To Repay (Debt) -- 1.3. To Fulfill (a Vow) -- 1.4. To Return (Something) -- 1.5. Observations on the Use of Particles -- 1.6. Synthesis of the Four Sub-Frames -- 2. To Retribute: To Reach Balance (Involving Three Parties) -- 2.1. Complete Syntactic Pattern: SP-D.5.5. -- 2.2. Four-Element SP: SP-D.5.4. -- 2.3. Three-Element SPs -- 2.4. Two-Element SPs -- 2.5. One-Element SPs -- 2.6. Synthesis -- 2.7. Observations on the Use of the Prepositions -- 3. Retribution as Balance -- 4. Cruces Interpretum -- 4.1. 1Kg 9:25 -- 4.2. Is 57:18 -- Chapter 3. The לם G Stem -- 1. To Be Complete and To Be Finished -- 1.1. To Be Complete -- 1.2. To Be Finished. |
|---|---|
| Description: | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources |
| Description matérielle: | 1 online resource (343 pages) |
| ISBN: | 978-90-04-46977-8 |
