Revisiting Moore’s Anti-Skeptical Argument in “Proof of an External World”
Abstract This paper argues that we should reject G. E. Moore’s anti-skeptical argument as it is presented in “Proof of an External World.” However, the reason I offer is different from traditional objections. A proper understanding of Moore’s “proof” requires paying attention to an important distinc...
Published in: | International journal for the study of skepticism |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2021
|
In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
|
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Moore, George Edward 1873-1958, Proof of an external world
/ Scepticism
/ Rejection of
/ Argumantation
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Ontology
B Epistemology B G. E. Moore B Skepticism B Knowledge |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1775615618 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211122182512.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211028s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-bja10014 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1775615618 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1775615618 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1244416169 |0 (DE-627)177567441X |4 aut |a Stratman, Christopher | |
109 | |a Stratman, Christopher | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Revisiting Moore’s Anti-Skeptical Argument in “Proof of an External World” |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract This paper argues that we should reject G. E. Moore’s anti-skeptical argument as it is presented in “Proof of an External World.” However, the reason I offer is different from traditional objections. A proper understanding of Moore’s “proof” requires paying attention to an important distinction between two forms of skepticism. I call these Ontological Skepticism and Epistemic Skepticism. The former is skepticism about the ontological status of fundamental reality, while the latter is skepticism about our empirical knowledge. Philosophers often assume that Moore’s response to “external world skepticism” deals exclusively with the former, not the latter. But this is a mistake. I shall argue that Moore’s anti-skeptical argument targets an ontological form of skepticism. Thus, the conclusion is an ontological claim about fundamental reality, while the premises are epistemic claims. If this is correct, then the conclusion outstrips the scope of its premises and proves too much. | ||
650 | 4 | |a G. E. Moore | |
650 | 4 | |a Ontology | |
650 | 4 | |a Skepticism | |
650 | 4 | |a Epistemology | |
650 | 4 | |a Knowledge | |
652 | |a AB:VA | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4247570-3 |0 (DE-627)701541571 |0 (DE-576)210488875 |a Moore, George Edward |2 gnd |d 1873-1958 |t Proof of an external world |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4055225-1 |0 (DE-627)104213140 |0 (DE-576)209112794 |2 gnd |a Skeptizismus |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4207950-0 |0 (DE-627)10511622X |0 (DE-576)210183314 |2 gnd |a Ablehnung |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4002899-9 |0 (DE-627)106391631 |0 (DE-576)208849173 |2 gnd |a Argumentation |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 11(2021), 4, Seite 289-311 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2021 |g number:4 |g pages:289-311 |
856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/STRRMA-5.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-bja10014 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/skep/11/4/article-p289_289.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 11 |j 2021 |e 4 |h 289-311 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 399691296X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1775615618 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211122182512 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211028||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-27#9CEF5036EA90ACF182637D6B15E76A8F32FA2FAC | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Argumantation,Reasoning,Rejection of,Refusal of,Dismissal and nonsuit,Scepticism,Scepsis,Skepticism |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentation,Raisonnement,Rejet,Révocation,Révocation,Révocation (droit civil),Scepticisme |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentación,Escepticismo,Rechazo |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Argomentazione,Rifiuto,Scetticismo |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 怀疑主义,怀疑论,拒絶,论据 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 懷疑主義,懷疑論,拒絶,論據 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentação,Ceticismo,Rejeição |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Аргументация,Отказ,Скептицизм |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Απόρριψη,Επιχειρηματολογία,Σκεπτικισμός |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Knowledge and scientific news |
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Skepsis,Skeptik , Argumentieren |