Revisiting Moore’s Anti-Skeptical Argument in “Proof of an External World”

Abstract This paper argues that we should reject G. E. Moore’s anti-skeptical argument as it is presented in “Proof of an External World.” However, the reason I offer is different from traditional objections. A proper understanding of Moore’s “proof” requires paying attention to an important distinc...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal for the study of skepticism
Main Author: Stratman, Christopher (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2021
In: International journal for the study of skepticism
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Moore, George Edward 1873-1958, Proof of an external world / Scepticism / Rejection of / Argumantation
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Ontology
B Epistemology
B G. E. Moore
B Skepticism
B Knowledge
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1775615618
003 DE-627
005 20211122182512.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211028s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22105700-bja10014  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1775615618 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1775615618 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1244416169  |0 (DE-627)177567441X  |4 aut  |a Stratman, Christopher 
109 |a Stratman, Christopher 
245 1 0 |a Revisiting Moore’s Anti-Skeptical Argument in “Proof of an External World” 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract This paper argues that we should reject G. E. Moore’s anti-skeptical argument as it is presented in “Proof of an External World.” However, the reason I offer is different from traditional objections. A proper understanding of Moore’s “proof” requires paying attention to an important distinction between two forms of skepticism. I call these Ontological Skepticism and Epistemic Skepticism. The former is skepticism about the ontological status of fundamental reality, while the latter is skepticism about our empirical knowledge. Philosophers often assume that Moore’s response to “external world skepticism” deals exclusively with the former, not the latter. But this is a mistake. I shall argue that Moore’s anti-skeptical argument targets an ontological form of skepticism. Thus, the conclusion is an ontological claim about fundamental reality, while the premises are epistemic claims. If this is correct, then the conclusion outstrips the scope of its premises and proves too much. 
650 4 |a G. E. Moore 
650 4 |a Ontology 
650 4 |a Skepticism 
650 4 |a Epistemology 
650 4 |a Knowledge 
652 |a AB:VA 
689 0 0 |d u  |0 (DE-588)4247570-3  |0 (DE-627)701541571  |0 (DE-576)210488875  |a Moore, George Edward  |2 gnd  |d 1873-1958  |t Proof of an external world 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4055225-1  |0 (DE-627)104213140  |0 (DE-576)209112794  |2 gnd  |a Skeptizismus 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4207950-0  |0 (DE-627)10511622X  |0 (DE-576)210183314  |2 gnd  |a Ablehnung 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4002899-9  |0 (DE-627)106391631  |0 (DE-576)208849173  |2 gnd  |a Argumentation 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for the study of skepticism  |d Leiden : Brill, 2011  |g 11(2021), 4, Seite 289-311  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)660812843  |w (DE-600)2610085-X  |w (DE-576)345005341  |x 2210-5700  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g pages:289-311 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/STRRMA-5.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-bja10014  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/skep/11/4/article-p289_289.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 11  |j 2021  |e 4  |h 289-311 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 399691296X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1775615618 
LOK |0 005 20211122182512 
LOK |0 008 211028||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-27#9CEF5036EA90ACF182637D6B15E76A8F32FA2FAC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Argumantation,Reasoning,Rejection of,Refusal of,Dismissal and nonsuit,Scepticism,Scepsis,Skepticism 
STB 0 0 |a Argumentation,Raisonnement,Rejet,Révocation,Révocation,Révocation (droit civil),Scepticisme 
STC 0 0 |a Argumentación,Escepticismo,Rechazo 
STD 0 0 |a Argomentazione,Rifiuto,Scetticismo 
STE 0 0 |a 怀疑主义,怀疑论,拒絶,论据 
STF 0 0 |a 懷疑主義,懷疑論,拒絶,論據 
STG 0 0 |a Argumentação,Ceticismo,Rejeição 
STH 0 0 |a Аргументация,Отказ,Скептицизм 
STI 0 0 |a Απόρριψη,Επιχειρηματολογία,Σκεπτικισμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Knowledge and scientific news 
SYG 0 0 |a Skepsis,Skeptik , Argumentieren