Epistemology’s Prime Evils
Abstract This essay addresses what we can call epistemology’s Prime Evils. These are the three demons epistemologists have conjured that are the most troublesome and the most difficult to dispel: Descartes’ classic demon; Lehrer and Cohen’s New Evil Demon; and Schaffer’s Debasing Demon. These demons...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2021
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2021, Volume: 11, Issue: 4, Pages: 312-354 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Epistemological contextualism
/ Cartesianism
/ Demon (Motif)
/ Scepticism
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
debasing demon
B New Evil Demon B Evil Demon B Justification B Skepticism B Knowledge |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1775615626 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211123082229.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211028s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-bja10021 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1775615626 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1775615626 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1153565439 |0 (DE-627)1015062253 |0 (DE-576)497292122 |4 aut |a Bondy, Patrick | |
| 109 | |a Bondy, Patrick | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Epistemology’s Prime Evils |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This essay addresses what we can call epistemology’s Prime Evils. These are the three demons epistemologists have conjured that are the most troublesome and the most difficult to dispel: Descartes’ classic demon; Lehrer and Cohen’s New Evil Demon; and Schaffer’s Debasing Demon. These demons threaten the epistemic statuses of our beliefs—in particular, the statuses of knowledge and justification—and they present challenges for our theories of these epistemic statuses. This paper explains the key features of these three central demons, highlights their family resemblances and differences, and attempts to show that a certain kind of internalist view of justification provides the resources to handle these demons well. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a New Evil Demon | |
| 650 | 4 | |a debasing demon | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evil Demon | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Skepticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Justification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Knowledge | |
| 652 | |a AB:VA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4998367-2 |0 (DE-627)504487566 |0 (DE-576)253204305 |2 gnd |a Epistemologischer Kontextualismus |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4147364-4 |0 (DE-627)104798459 |0 (DE-576)209756225 |2 gnd |a Cartesianismus |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4122104-7 |0 (DE-627)105764817 |0 (DE-576)209548738 |2 gnd |a Dämon |g Motiv |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4055225-1 |0 (DE-627)104213140 |0 (DE-576)209112794 |2 gnd |a Skeptizismus |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 11(2021), 4, Seite 312-354 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2021 |g number:4 |g pages:312-354 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-bja10021 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/skep/11/4/article-p312_312.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 11 |j 2021 |e 4 |h 312-354 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3996912978 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1775615626 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211123082229 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211028||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-27#BFC89DC5110E9700B4D42CA84FE75F633B44B230 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Cartesianism,Epistemological contextualism,Scepticism,Scepsis,Skepticism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Cartésianisme,Contextualisme épistémologique,Scepticisme |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Cartesianismo,Contextualismo epistemológico,Escepticismo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Cartesianesimo,Contestualismo epistemologico,Scetticismo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 怀疑主义,怀疑论,笛卡儿主义,笛卡尔主义 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 懷疑主義,懷疑論,笛卡兒主義,笛卡爾主義 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Cartesianismo,Ceticismo,Contextualismo epistemológico |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Картезианство,Скептицизм,Эпистемологический контекстуализм |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Επιστημολογικός συγκειμενισμός,Καρτεσιανισμός,Σκεπτικισμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Knowledge and scientific news |
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Kontextualismus , Kartesianismus , Dämonen,Böser Geist,Daimon,Dämonen,Demon , Skepsis,Skeptik |