Who Wants to Be (Called) Religious?
Drawing on recent work in the field of law and religion, this paper focuses on the skepticism often displayed towards a term that is simultaneously enabling and limiting: that of “religion.” Regardless of our interrogation of it, this terminology is operative in the world—not only among the scholars...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
2021
|
In: |
Political theology
Year: 2021, Volume: 22, Issue: 5, Pages: 444-449 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religion
|
RelBib Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy |
Further subjects: | B
Indigenous Religion
B Law B Evangelical Christianity B Noble Drew Ali B Religious Freedom B CATEGORY OF RELIGION |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Drawing on recent work in the field of law and religion, this paper focuses on the skepticism often displayed towards a term that is simultaneously enabling and limiting: that of “religion.” Regardless of our interrogation of it, this terminology is operative in the world—not only among the scholars who frame it as a second-order category, but among our interlocutors, kinship networks, and public figures. Given the baggage that often accompanies it, I argue that it is unsurprising that so many of us are hesitant to apply this label to the people, places, and practices to which we attach meaning. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1743-1719 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Political theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2021.1881700 |