On doubting dichotomies: A response to Don Cupitt
This article is a response to Don Cupitt’s article ‘After the end of the world’, published in Theology (July 2014). It argues that doubts are always worth doubting, critical questions warrant critical questioning, that imagination is more prevalent than sceptics acknowledge, and that there are space...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2015
|
| In: |
Theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 118, Issue: 1, Pages: 26-30 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Cupitt
B Imagination B dichotomy B Critical B Agnosticism B realism / antirealism B Doubt B Scepticism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This article is a response to Don Cupitt’s article ‘After the end of the world’, published in Theology (July 2014). It argues that doubts are always worth doubting, critical questions warrant critical questioning, that imagination is more prevalent than sceptics acknowledge, and that there are spaces that dichotomies arbitrarily banish. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2044-2696 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "After the end of the world (2014)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040571X14551677 |