Ethical Screening and Financial Performance: The Case of Islamic Equity Funds
Whether ethical screening affects portfolio performance is an important question that is yet to be settled in the literature. This paper aims to shed further light on this question by examining the performance of a large global sample of Islamic equity funds (IEFs) from 1984 to 2010. We find that IE...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Collaborateurs: | ; |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publié: |
2016
|
Dans: |
Journal of business ethics
Année: 2016, Volume: 137, Numéro: 1, Pages: 83-99 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
A13
B G11 B Islamic equity funds B Ethical investments B Fund performance B G34 B G23 B G12 B Z12 B Ethical Screening |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | Whether ethical screening affects portfolio performance is an important question that is yet to be settled in the literature. This paper aims to shed further light on this question by examining the performance of a large global sample of Islamic equity funds (IEFs) from 1984 to 2010. We find that IEFs underperform conventional funds by an average of 40 basis points per month, consistent with the underperformance hypothesis. In line with popular media claims that Islamic funds are a safer investment, IEFs outperformed conventional funds during the recent banking crisis. However, we find no such outperformance for other crises or high volatility periods. Based on fund holdings-based data, we provide evidence of a negative curvilinear relation between fund performance and ethical screening intensity, consistent with a return trade-off to being more ethical. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2529-5 |