Plagiarism in the Sacred Sciences: Three Impediments to Institutional Reform
This article diagnoses the problem of plagiarism in academic books and articles in the disciplines of philosophy and theology. It identifies three impediments to institutional reform. They are: (1) a misplaced desire to preserve personal and institutional reputations; (2) a failure to recognize that...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Philosophy Documentation Center
2020
|
| Dans: |
Philosophy & theology
Année: 2020, Volume: 32, Numéro: 1/2, Pages: 27-61 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Plagiat
/ Philosophie
/ Théologie
|
| RelBib Classification: | FB Formation théologique VA Philosophie |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | This article diagnoses the problem of plagiarism in academic books and articles in the disciplines of philosophy and theology. It identifies three impediments to institutional reform. They are: (1) a misplaced desire to preserve personal and institutional reputations; (2) a failure to recognize that attribution in academic writing admits of degrees; and (3) a disproportionate emphasis on the so-called "intention to plagiarize." A detailed case study provides an illustration of the need for institutional reform in the post-publication processes in the disciplines of philosophy and theology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2153-828X |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Philosophy & theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/philtheol2021622134 |