An Amenable Arrangement: The Unification of the Nichiren Sect in Sixteenth-Century Kyoto

In this article, I argue that the Nichiren sect in Kyoto was able to recover from its near destruction in 1536 and maintain its position in the capital through the violent sixteenth century by unifying its disparate and contentious lineages under a new governing body, the Council of Head Temples. Un...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Japanese journal of religious studies
Main Author: Sherer, Daniel 1963- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Nanzan Institute 2021
In: Japanese journal of religious studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 48, Issue: 1, Pages: 73-102
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Kyoto / Nichiren / Schism / Religious conflict / Unification / Zeit der Kämpfenden Länder / History 1500-1600
RelBib Classification:AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
BL Buddhism
KBM Asia
TJ Modern history
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:In this article, I argue that the Nichiren sect in Kyoto was able to recover from its near destruction in 1536 and maintain its position in the capital through the violent sixteenth century by unifying its disparate and contentious lineages under a new governing body, the Council of Head Temples. Unknown until the discovery of its documents in 1982, the council allowed the sect, as a unit, to negotiate with warrior power. The council was the culmination of pro-unity forces in the sect, especially those who succeeded in convincing the two sides to stop fighting each other over the sect's greatest doctrinal dispute. Previous scholarship has treated the Nichiren sect in the late sixteenth century as being at the mercy of powerful warriors. This article shows that the monks of the Nichiren sect were able to muster considerable resources and not only negotiate better treatment from the warriors but even drive warrior policy.
Contains:Enthalten in: Japanese journal of religious studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.18874/jjrs.48.1.2021.73-102