En Gud värdig tillbedjan: En filosofisk analys av tillbedjan, panteism och det gudomligas personlighet

The purpose of this paper is to widen the discussion on worship and question the assumption that only a personal God can be worthy of worship. Within philosophy of religion, the contemporary debate on worship axiomatically assumes that only a personal God is worthy of worship and a conception of God...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Langby, Lina (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Suédois
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Bloms Boktryckeri 2021
Dans: Svensk teologisk kvartalskrift
Année: 2021, Volume: 97, Numéro: 4, Pages: 319-333
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Otto, Rudolf 1869-1937, Le sacré / Adoration / Dieu / Panthéisme
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
TJ Époque moderne
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:The purpose of this paper is to widen the discussion on worship and question the assumption that only a personal God can be worthy of worship. Within philosophy of religion, the contemporary debate on worship axiomatically assumes that only a personal God is worthy of worship and a conception of God tends to only be regarded as religiously adequate if the god in question is worthy of worship. In this paper, I focus on monistic non-personal pantheism: a conception of the divine as a non-personal Unity. The analysis looks to the "radical model" of worship outlined by George Chryssides and the theory of the numinous by Rudolf Otto. The radical model for worship does not accept that only a personal being can be worthy of worship. The article shows that Otto's theory of the numinous can be used to bridge the gap between non-personal, and personal, conceptions of God/the divine. In other words, even if we accept Otto's theory of the holy and the numinous we cannot draw the conclusion that only a personal God can be worthy of worship.
Contient:Enthalten in: Svensk teologisk kvartalskrift
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.51619/stk.v97i4.23713