Hearing Voices, Interpreting Words
In this commentary I will be exploring a number of implications that McCauley and Graham’s theses about the interrelationship of normal, religious, and mentally disordered cognition have for an interpretative methodology that has been fruitfully utilized by empirically-oriented scholars of religion....
| Published in: | Journal for the cognitive science of religion |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Equinox Publ.
2021
|
| In: |
Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 9-20 |
| Review of: | Hearing voices and other matters of the mind (New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2020) (Gardiner, Mark Q.)
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religious experience
/ Mental illness
/ Methodology
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AE Psychology of religion |
| Further subjects: | B
Interpretation of
B Book review B Religion B Cognition B Behavior B Mental Disorder |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In this commentary I will be exploring a number of implications that McCauley and Graham’s theses about the interrelationship of normal, religious, and mentally disordered cognition have for an interpretative methodology that has been fruitfully utilized by empirically-oriented scholars of religion. I argue that that methodology imposes some important constraints on the type of theorizing McCauley and Graham propose, and that their findings in turn suggest some important modifications to that methodology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2049-7563 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Gods in Disorder (2021)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.19502 |