Religious Experiences Are Interpreted through Priors from Cultural Frameworks Supported by Imaginative Capacity Rather Than Special Cognition

In this commentary of McCauley and Graham’s book on mental abnormalities and religions, we identify a number of challenges, and present possible extensions of their proposed research. Specifically, we argue that no specialized religious cognition should be assumed, and instead suggest that the cases...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Mulukom, Valerie van (Auteur) ; Lang, Martin 1971- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Review
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Equinox Publ. 2021
Dans: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Année: 2019, Volume: 7, Numéro: 1, Pages: 39-53
Compte rendu de:Hearing voices and other matters of the mind (New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2020) (Mulukom, Valerie van)
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Trouble psychique / Religiosité / Système culturel / Imagination / Prädiktive Codierung / Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
RelBib Classification:AE Psychologie de la religion
Sujets non-standardisés:B Cognitive Science
B Predictive processing
B Imagination
B Compte-rendu de lecture
B Mental Disorders
B Religion
B cultural frameworks
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:In this commentary of McCauley and Graham’s book on mental abnormalities and religions, we identify a number of challenges, and present possible extensions of their proposed research. Specifically, we argue that no specialized religious cognition should be assumed, and instead suggest that the cases of mental abnormalities discussed in the book specify particular instances of religious content, and that other disorders may show a more causal relationship to religiosity. We argue that the discussed religious content may be best explained in the context of cultural frameworks and their contribution to experiencing the world through priors and predictive processing. Moreover, cognition required to understand and engage with religion, but not special to it, might crucially involve our capacity for imagination, supported by memory. Disorders in imagination are therefore expected to show likewise dysfunctions in religious phenomena.
ISSN:2049-7563
Référence:Kritik in "Gods in Disorder (2021)"
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.19803