How Cognitive Is the Cognitive Science of Religion?
In this commentary on An Introduction to the Cognitive Science of Religion by Claire White, I reflect on how the lack of clarification of a key concept, i.e., cognition, leads to a distorted image of the field. This is because different strands of research can now be represented in a cognitivist con...
| Published in: | Journal for the cognitive science of religion |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Equinox Publ.
2022
|
| In: |
Journal for the cognitive science of religion
|
| Review of: | An introduction to the cognitive science of religion (London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2021) (Kundtová Klocová, Eva)
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
/ Cognition
/ Prädiktive Codierung
/ Cultural evolution
/ Adaptive system
|
| RelBib Classification: | AE Psychology of religion |
| Further subjects: | B
Cognitive Science
B Book review B Cultural Evolution B predictive coding B Religion B Complex Adaptive Systems B conceptual hygiene B Cognition |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In this commentary on An Introduction to the Cognitive Science of Religion by Claire White, I reflect on how the lack of clarification of a key concept, i.e., cognition, leads to a distorted image of the field. This is because different strands of research can now be represented in a cognitivist context. I also ask to what extent this field is still concerned with research on cognitive mechanisms and constraints and whether the cognitivist paradigm truly represents most of the field. I argue that other theoretical frameworks, such as predictive coding theory, cultural evolution, and complex adaptive systems are recently of importance in the CSR and should be rendered in similar detail as the "standard model" of the CSR framework. I further suggest that some shortcomings in the explicit communication of conceptual definitions may be to blame for theoretical misunderstandings and a feeling of a biased image of the discipline. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2049-7563 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Five Issues in the Debate: A Response to Critics (2022)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.20919 |