Bringing back the social into the sociology of religion: A response to Jean-Pierre Reed
This piece is a response to Jean-Pierre Reed’s review of Bringing Back the Social into the Sociology of Religion published in Critical Research on Religion. Aside from his appreciation for the contributions of this volume, Jean-Pierre Reed’s critique concentrates on three fundamental issues in relat...
| Published in: | Critical research on religion |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2022
|
| In: |
Critical research on religion
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Reed, Jean-Pierre 1964-
/ Religious sociology
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AD Sociology of religion; religious policy |
| Further subjects: | B
Methodology
B Epistemology B Objectivity B Sociology B Religion |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | This piece is a response to Jean-Pierre Reed’s review of Bringing Back the Social into the Sociology of Religion published in Critical Research on Religion. Aside from his appreciation for the contributions of this volume, Jean-Pierre Reed’s critique concentrates on three fundamental issues in relation to the agenda for a critical sociology of religion we advance: scientificism, interdisciplinarity, and politics. This response focuses on scientificism and politics in particular, since they are intimately related and at the core of this book’s evaluation of the subfield. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2050-3040 |
| Reference: | Kommentar zu "Véronique Altglas and Matthew Wood (eds), Bringing Back the Social Into the Sociology of Religion: Critical Approaches (2021)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/20503032221075383 |