The Trinity as social and constitutional: a rejoinder to Brian Leftow
Brian Leftow continues to argue against my use of the constitution relation in explaining the Trinity. I consider his arguments, and have a bit more to say about Leftow's own formulation of trinitarian doctrine.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2021
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 57, Issue: 3, Pages: 553-562 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Trinity
/ Constitution (Philosophy)
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
| Further subjects: | B
Commentary
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Brian Leftow continues to argue against my use of the constitution relation in explaining the Trinity. I consider his arguments, and have a bit more to say about Leftow's own formulation of trinitarian doctrine. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Reference: | Kritik von "The Trinity is still unconstitutional (2020)"
Kritik in "Can the constitution be saved? (2023)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412520000396 |