The Trinity as social and constitutional: a rejoinder to Brian Leftow

Brian Leftow continues to argue against my use of the constitution relation in explaining the Trinity. I consider his arguments, and have a bit more to say about Leftow's own formulation of trinitarian doctrine.

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hasker, William 1935- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2021
In: Religious studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 57, Issue: 3, Pages: 553-562
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Trinity / Constitution (Philosophy)
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B Commentary
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1804356530
003 DE-627
005 20230802160804.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220525s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0034412520000396  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1804356530 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1804356530 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1025833031  |0 (DE-627)724880097  |0 (DE-576)166104396  |4 aut  |a Hasker, William  |d 1935- 
109 |a Hasker, William 1935- 
245 1 4 |a The Trinity as social and constitutional: a rejoinder to Brian Leftow 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Brian Leftow continues to argue against my use of the constitution relation in explaining the Trinity. I consider his arguments, and have a bit more to say about Leftow's own formulation of trinitarian doctrine. 
601 |a Leftow, Brian 
652 |a AB:NBC 
655 7 |a Kommentar  |0 (DE-588)4136710-8  |0 (DE-627)104500719  |0 (DE-576)209671467  |2 gnd-content 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4060909-1  |0 (DE-627)106137859  |0 (DE-576)209137223  |2 gnd  |a Trinität 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4136655-4  |0 (DE-627)105655880  |0 (DE-576)209671033  |2 gnd  |a Konstitution  |g Philosophie 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 57(2021), 3, Seite 553-562  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:57  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:553-562 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Leftow, Brian, 1956 -   |t The Trinity is still unconstitutional  |d 2020  |w (DE-627)1804356522 
787 0 8 |i Kritik in  |a Leftow, Brian, 1956 -   |t Can the constitution be saved?  |d 2023  |w (DE-627)1833278836 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412520000396  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/trinity-as-social-and-constitutional-a-rejoinder-to-brian-leftow/6B4ADF7ED41236D79E755A192A1EA7A5  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 57  |j 2021  |e 3  |h 553-562 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4139543884 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1804356530 
LOK |0 005 20230724104004 
LOK |0 008 220525||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Trinity,Trinity,Trinity in literature 
STB 0 0 |a Trinité,Trinité 
STC 0 0 |a Trinidad,Trinidad 
STD 0 0 |a Trinità,Trinità 
STE 0 0 |a 三位一体,三位一体 
STF 0 0 |a 三位一體,三位一體 
STG 0 0 |a Trindade,Trindade 
STH 0 0 |a Троица (мотив),Троица 
STI 0 0 |a Τριάδα (μοτίβο),Τριάδα 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Dreieinigkeit,Dreifaltigkeit,Dreiheit 

Similar Items

more