Gender Relations and the Biblical Drama
The author, a Reformed academic psychologist, cites principles for the use of Scripture from her own theological tradition. These include acknowledging that there is no unmediated reading of Scripture, that Scripture should be read as a cosmic drama, and not just as isolated proof-texts, and that th...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Sage Publishing
2005
|
Dans: |
Journal of psychology and theology
Année: 2005, Volume: 33, Numéro: 2, Pages: 122-126 |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
Résumé: | The author, a Reformed academic psychologist, cites principles for the use of Scripture from her own theological tradition. These include acknowledging that there is no unmediated reading of Scripture, that Scripture should be read as a cosmic drama, and not just as isolated proof-texts, and that the ‘rule of purpose’ should be observed. These principles are then applied to the debate on male headship vs. gender mutuality, with special reference to the problem of over-reading gender-essentialist archetypes into Scripture. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2328-1162 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of psychology and theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/009164710503300205 |