Moving Beyond Religious Clichés: A Review

The article reviews the most recent systematic effort to correct some of the widespread misconceptions about religion: Brad Stoddard and Craig Martin’s edited volume Stereotyping Religion: Critiquing Clichés (2017) and Tenzan Eaghll’s article “Religious Clichés” (2015). It argues that the joint goal...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Numen
Main Author: Hubina, Milos (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2022
In: Numen
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Science of Religion / Cliché / Stereotyping / Essentialism / Relativism
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
Further subjects:B Ninian Smart
B Essentialism
B Relativism
B religious clichés
B study of religion
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The article reviews the most recent systematic effort to correct some of the widespread misconceptions about religion: Brad Stoddard and Craig Martin’s edited volume Stereotyping Religion: Critiquing Clichés (2017) and Tenzan Eaghll’s article “Religious Clichés” (2015). It argues that the joint goal becomes problematic due to some empirical and logical distortions, which mainly result from the emphasis on the relativist message offsetting the impartial assessment of facts and their implications. It argues for integrating the biological and cultural explanations of religion and offers some proposals toward identifying the contemporary clichés that impede progress in our understanding of the phenomenon.
ISSN:1568-5276
Reference:Analyse von "Stereotyping religion (London : Bloomsbury Academic, 2017)"
Analyse von "Religion Clichés (2015)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Numen
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685276-12341670