Survivals: The Stakes of Religious Literacy

Johannes Wolfart makes a compelling case that the nebulousness of “religious literacy” belies a complicated history not just of “religion” but of “literacy” in his recent article, “‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations,” in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion. Wolfart h...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Method & theory in the study of religion
Main Author: Fuerst, Ilyse R. Morgenstein (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2022
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2022, Volume: 34, Issue: 5, Pages: 435-445
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Knowledge / Religion / Literacy / Religious minority
RelBib Classification:AA Study of religion
AH Religious education
AX Inter-religious relations
Further subjects:B Commentary
B Racialization
B religious illiteracy
B minoritized communities
B Survival
B Religious Literacy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Johannes Wolfart makes a compelling case that the nebulousness of “religious literacy” belies a complicated history not just of “religion” but of “literacy” in his recent article, “‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations,” in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion. Wolfart has reservations about religious literacy, its instrumentalization, and specifically the lack of empirical evidence that would support programs that promote religious literacy. He is concerned that “religion,” “literacy,” and of course “religious literacy” are imbricated in theological projects, whether alive or long dead; ultimately, we might characterize his position as deeply concerned with religious literacy as a liberal Protestant project. In this response essay, I suggest that reducing religious literacy to Protestant liberalism prioritizes thought experiments over the survival of minoritized people and communities. It is clear that religious literacy is a framework deployed not for lofty goals of social betterment or a vague sense of liberation, but for survival: survival of academic programs and departments, survival of a body politic, and often the survival of individuals and groups who are targets of hate.
ISSN:1570-0682
Reference:Kommentar zu "‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations (2022)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-bja10078