Religious Literacy as Religion Literacy: A Response from the UK

This response builds on Wolfart’s observations on the theological underpinnings of the “religious literacy” paradigm in a North American context by reflecting on the situation in the United Kingdom. Here, it is even more apparent that institutional factors are a bigger driver than methodological fac...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Method & theory in the study of religion
Main Author: Robertson, David G. 1975- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2022
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2022, Volume: 34, Issue: 5, Pages: 475-483
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Great Britain / Knowledge / Religion / Religious pedagogy / Religious studies / Religious education
RelBib Classification:AA Study of religion
AH Religious education
Further subjects:B Commentary
B TRS
B Religious Education
B United Kingdom
B Interfaith
B Religious Literacy
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:This response builds on Wolfart’s observations on the theological underpinnings of the “religious literacy” paradigm in a North American context by reflecting on the situation in the United Kingdom. Here, it is even more apparent that institutional factors are a bigger driver than methodological factors, driven by the neo-liberalisation of the universities and the entrenched institutional dominance of confessional approaches to the study of religion. Yet it also provides a way for social-scientific scholars of religion to explain the instrumental value of the subject to policymakers and funding bodies. I conclude by sketching an approach to religious literacy more in keeping with post-phenomenological Religious Studies.
ISSN:1570-0682
Reference:Kommentar zu "‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations (2022)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-bja10084