Why does ‘academic’ theology disable ministry?

Dissatisfaction about the ‘academic’ nature of ministerial training has existed for a considerable time. In a small-scale qualitative study of ministers in the Anglican Diocese of Oxford, England, it emerged that most if not all had experienced a disconnect between their academic study and the reali...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Practical theology
Main Author: Heywood, David 1955- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2022
In: Practical theology
RelBib Classification:FB Theological education
RB Church office; congregation
ZF Education
Further subjects:B communities of practice
B Academic theology
B pastoral imagination
B signature pedagogies
B whole-life discipleship
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Dissatisfaction about the ‘academic’ nature of ministerial training has existed for a considerable time. In a small-scale qualitative study of ministers in the Anglican Diocese of Oxford, England, it emerged that most if not all had experienced a disconnect between their academic study and the realities of ministry and had found the study of academic theology disabling for ministry. This article uses the framework of learning in communities of practice to explore their experience. It concludes that the disconnect stems from the subject-centred nature of theological scholarship in contrast to the life-centred concerns of discipleship and ministry. The interests of academic theologians frequently do not tally with those of ministers and the nature of academic theology differs from that of the ‘everyday’ theology that forms a component of a Christian social imaginary. The signature pedagogy required for ministerial formation is a pedagogy of theological reflection rather than theological scholarship.
ISSN:1756-0748
Contains:Enthalten in: Practical theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1756073X.2022.2050974