KIERKEGAARD'S “NEW ARGUMENT” FOR IMMORTALITY

This essay examines texts from Kierkegaard's signed and pseudonymous authorship on immortality and the resurrection, challenging the received opinion that Kierkegaard's account of eternal life merely connotes a temporal, existential modality of experience as a present eternity. Kierkegaard...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marks, Tamara Monet (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2010
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2010, Volume: 38, Issue: 1, Pages: 143-186
Further subjects:B Resurrection
B Grace
B Kierkegaard
B Immortality
B Eschatology
B Judgment
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822386934
003 DE-627
005 20221115052627.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00417.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822386934 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822386934 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Marks, Tamara Monet  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Marks, Tamara Monet  |a Marks, Tamara M. 
245 1 0 |a KIERKEGAARD'S “NEW ARGUMENT” FOR IMMORTALITY 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This essay examines texts from Kierkegaard's signed and pseudonymous authorship on immortality and the resurrection, challenging the received opinion that Kierkegaard's account of eternal life merely connotes a temporal, existential modality of experience as a present eternity. Kierkegaard's thoughts on immortality are more complicated than this reading allows. I demonstrate that Kierkegaard's ideas on the afterlife emerge out of a context in which the topic had been vigorously debated in both Germany and Denmark for more than a decade. In responding to these debates, Kierkegaard establishes a “new argument” for immortality that stands as a robust account of the Christian resurrection and highlights the power of a personal God at the center of life, death, and post-mortem existence. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Grace 
650 4 |a Eschatology 
650 4 |a Judgment 
650 4 |a Resurrection 
650 4 |a Immortality 
650 4 |a Kierkegaard 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 38(2010), 1, Seite 143-186  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:38  |g year:2010  |g number:1  |g pages:143-186 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25676550  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00417.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00417.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211030310 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822386934 
LOK |0 005 20221115052627 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#3764AA632BA7D4F17C6372740161C1F36DC8E979 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25676550 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL