KIERKEGAARD'S “NEW ARGUMENT” FOR IMMORTALITY
This essay examines texts from Kierkegaard's signed and pseudonymous authorship on immortality and the resurrection, challenging the received opinion that Kierkegaard's account of eternal life merely connotes a temporal, existential modality of experience as a present eternity. Kierkegaard...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2010
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2010, Volume: 38, Issue: 1, Pages: 143-186 |
Further subjects: | B
Resurrection
B Grace B Kierkegaard B Immortality B Eschatology B Judgment |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1822386934 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221115052627.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221115s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00417.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1822386934 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1822386934 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Marks, Tamara Monet |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Marks, Tamara Monet |a Marks, Tamara M. | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a KIERKEGAARD'S “NEW ARGUMENT” FOR IMMORTALITY |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This essay examines texts from Kierkegaard's signed and pseudonymous authorship on immortality and the resurrection, challenging the received opinion that Kierkegaard's account of eternal life merely connotes a temporal, existential modality of experience as a present eternity. Kierkegaard's thoughts on immortality are more complicated than this reading allows. I demonstrate that Kierkegaard's ideas on the afterlife emerge out of a context in which the topic had been vigorously debated in both Germany and Denmark for more than a decade. In responding to these debates, Kierkegaard establishes a “new argument” for immortality that stands as a robust account of the Christian resurrection and highlights the power of a personal God at the center of life, death, and post-mortem existence. | ||
601 | |a Argumentation | ||
650 | 4 | |a Grace | |
650 | 4 | |a Eschatology | |
650 | 4 | |a Judgment | |
650 | 4 | |a Resurrection | |
650 | 4 | |a Immortality | |
650 | 4 | |a Kierkegaard | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 38(2010), 1, Seite 143-186 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2010 |g number:1 |g pages:143-186 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25676550 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00417.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00417.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4211030310 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1822386934 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221115052627 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#3764AA632BA7D4F17C6372740161C1F36DC8E979 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25676550 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |