Journalists' Attitudes toward New Religious Movements

This paper is a follow-up to a large content analysis project of print media coverage of new religious movements (sometimes called "cults"). That research, which has now been replicated both in the U.K. and in Australia by other scholars, showed biases and misinformation in the way certain...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of religious research
Authors: Richardson, James T. (Author) ; van Driel, Barend (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 1997
In: Review of religious research
Year: 1997, Volume: 39, Issue: 2, Pages: 116-136
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This paper is a follow-up to a large content analysis project of print media coverage of new religious movements (sometimes called "cults"). That research, which has now been replicated both in the U.K. and in Australia by other scholars, showed biases and misinformation in the way certain new religious phenomena were presented, but begged the question of why such differences might exist. This paper reports research carried out in the U.S. on the issue of possible bias and misinformation about new religions among journalists. Of particular note is research with a sample of individual religious newswriters in America who were sent surveys in an effort to ascertain their attitudes toward and experiences with minority religions, as well as toward participants in the "anti-cult movement." Results of the survey show correspondence between earlier findings from the content analysis research, raising questions about the overall objectivity and neutrality of journalists covering the groups. Implications of the findings are discussed.
ISSN:2211-4866
Contains:Enthalten in: Review of religious research
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/3512177