Moral Man and Immoral Science?

Is the human being dehumanized when studied “scientifically”? Prominent sociologists and psychologists have charged that any “natural science” of persons either must, or usually does, “depersonalize” or “reify” the subject of study. Specificesues have been raised about the image or concept of the hu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: King, Morton B. (Author) ; Hunt, Richard A. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [publisher not identified] 1974
In: Sociological analysis
Year: 1974, Volume: 35, Issue: 4, Pages: 240-250
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Is the human being dehumanized when studied “scientifically”? Prominent sociologists and psychologists have charged that any “natural science” of persons either must, or usually does, “depersonalize” or “reify” the subject of study. Specificesues have been raised about the image or concept of the human being (“deterined” “free” etc.) and about the appropriateness of applying a natural scence perspective to the study of persons. The charges are serious and dese ve concerned attention. However, we attribute the dangers, not to characteristics inherent in the scientific perspective and method, but either to poor science or to poor morals. The argument covers three areas: the concept to be applied to the human being, both as subject and as scientist; the epistemological assumptions of current natural science; and the plural roles involved in research, including “scientist” and “moral man/woman.” We conclude that a natural science of human behavior is possible without inevitable harm to subject or scientist.
ISSN:2325-7873
Contains:Enthalten in: Sociological analysis
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/3710608