Iris Murdoch between buddhism and christianity: moral change, conceptual loss/recovery, unselfing

The article discusses Iris Murdoch’s philosophical relationship to Buddhism. First, we argue that Murdoch was not, and did not identify herself as, a Buddhist. Then we suggest caution regarding Murdoch’s interpretations of Buddhism. On the one hand, she applies the limited viewpoint of her era. On t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of philosophy and theology
Authors: Beran, Ondřej 1979- (Author) ; Marchal, Kai 1974- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis 2022
In: International journal of philosophy and theology
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Murdoch, Iris 1919-1999 / Buddhism / Christianity / Religion
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
BL Buddhism
CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
Further subjects:B unselfing
B Iris Murdoch
B Buddhism
B conceptual change
B Christianity
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The article discusses Iris Murdoch’s philosophical relationship to Buddhism. First, we argue that Murdoch was not, and did not identify herself as, a Buddhist. Then we suggest caution regarding Murdoch’s interpretations of Buddhism. On the one hand, she applies the limited viewpoint of her era. On the other hand, her approach is motivated by insights tracing affinities between Buddhism and Husserl’s and Sartre’s analyses of consciousness, as well as Platonic ideas of unselfing and self-purification. Murdoch’s reflections on Buddhism serve primarily a complex argument about the role of religion in our moral lives, as these reflect the rapidly changing Western cultural environment. She envisages the possibility for Christianity to learn from Buddhism and move closer towards demythologisation and a radical, loving commitment to the others here and now. While Murdoch’s observations may not be accurate as a ‘diagnosis of our times’, they serve as a valuable opening for reflecting on our lives in the suggested terms. They are also inspiring in their optimism that there is the possibility to learn from others (other cultures, other religions) for the better. The ‘muddled’ nature of our reality does not thwart this possibility of learning; it only makes its particular steps unpredictable.
ISSN:2169-2335
Contains:Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2022.2129744