Naturalismus oder Dualismus?: Zu Ansgar Beckermann

In opposition to Beckermann's naturalism, I defend a concept of a »genuine mental causality«: there are processes (for instance speech-acts) which cannot be explained without the application of mental concepts like »I believe«, or »I want«. Yet this mental causality is in no way an immaterial c...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophische Rundschau
Main Author: Rohs, Peter 1936- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Mohr Siebeck 2022
In: Philosophische Rundschau
Year: 2022, Volume: 69, Issue: 3, Pages: 302-314
RelBib Classification:NBE Anthropology
TK Recent history
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Action
B genuinementalcausality
B Naturalism
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:In opposition to Beckermann's naturalism, I defend a concept of a »genuine mental causality«: there are processes (for instance speech-acts) which cannot be explained without the application of mental concepts like »I believe«, or »I want«. Yet this mental causality is in no way an immaterial causality, since it is always materially conditioned. Such a dualism is therefore not a cartesian dualism of material and immaterial entities, and there is no need for any form of a downward causation, which would be an immaterial process. An action is a uniform process, not an interaction of two processes, which is, however, both inexplicable without mental concepts and has material conditions at the same time. The laws required for the explanation of such processes are not physical laws with a deterministic force. I therefore hold that only this structure secures freedom and responsibility, which are not compatible with naturalism.Ansgar Beckermann, Naturalismus - Entwurf eines wissenschaftlich fundierten Weltund Menschenbilds, Paderborn: Brill/mentis, 2021. 156 S.
ISSN:1868-7261
Contains:Enthalten in: Philosophische Rundschau
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1628/phr-2022-0032