Response: The Compatibility of Evolution and Design
Denis Alexander, David Glass, Peter Jeavons, Meghan Page, Bethany Sollereder, and Mats Wahlberg have offered interpretations, critique, and defenses of E. V. R. Kojonen's book The Compatibility of Evolution and Design. Here, Kojonen responds to their comments on wideranging issues related to th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2022
|
| In: |
Zygon
Year: 2022, Volume: 57, Issue: 4, Pages: 1108-1123 |
| Further subjects: | B
argument from design
B Evolution B Divine Action B Darwinism B Teleology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | Denis Alexander, David Glass, Peter Jeavons, Meghan Page, Bethany Sollereder, and Mats Wahlberg have offered interpretations, critique, and defenses of E. V. R. Kojonen's book The Compatibility of Evolution and Design. Here, Kojonen responds to their comments on wideranging issues related to the teleology and evolution, from models of God as Creator to the meaning of randomness and design. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Reference: | Kommentar zu "The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium (2022)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12845 |