An Algorithmic Information Theory Challenge to Intelligent Design

William Dembski claims to have established a decision process to determine when highly unlikely events observed in the natural world are due to Intelligent Design. This article argues that, as no implementable randomness test is superior to a universal Martin-Löf test, this test should be used to re...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zygon
Main Author: Devine, Sean (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2014
In: Zygon
Year: 2014, Volume: 49, Issue: 1, Pages: 42-65
Further subjects:B Intelligent design
B algorithmic information theory
B randomness test
B algorithmic entropy
B fourth law of thermodynamics
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic
Description
Summary:William Dembski claims to have established a decision process to determine when highly unlikely events observed in the natural world are due to Intelligent Design. This article argues that, as no implementable randomness test is superior to a universal Martin-Löf test, this test should be used to replace Dembski's decision process. Furthermore, Dembski's decision process is flawed, as natural explanations are eliminated before chance. Dembski also introduces a fourth law of thermodynamics, his “law of conservation of information,” to argue that information cannot increase by natural processes. However, this article, using algorithmic information theory, shows that this law is no more than the second law of thermodynamics. The article concludes that any discussions on the possibilities of design interventions in nature should be articulated in terms of the algorithmic information theory approach to randomness and its robust decision process.
ISSN:1467-9744
Contains:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12059